Convention Center
Sacramento, California
Wednesday, June 3, 2009; 3:00 pm – 4:30 pm
Presiding:
Steve White, Chair
Cas Pinkowski, Vice Chair
Georgia Richardson, Vice Chair
LeFrancis Arnold, Committee Liaison
C.A.R. Staff:
Dave Milton
Matt Roberts
I. Opening Comments
II. State Legislation
A. C.A.R-sponsored Bill
SB 206 (Dutton) State Parity with Federal Housing Tax Credit for
First-time Homebuyers - In Early may the C.A.R. Officers, in order
to pursue a proactive course of action on housing, decided to sponsor SB
206 which creates a first-time homebuyer's tax credit, equal to 10% of the
sale price of a home (not to exceed $8,000) for homes purchased as a
principal residence of the taxpayer. This credit will only be available to
first time homebuyers whose income does not exceed $95,000 and married
couples whose combined income does not exceed $170,000. SB 206 also
provides this tax credit to any buyer of an REO property for a principal
residence. The bill will be effective for one year from the date of its
enactment.
Status: Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee
B. Other Housing Tax Credit Legislation
AB 765 (Caballero) Lifting of Funding Cap on Housing Tax Credit for
Purchase of New Homes - This is the Assembly version of SB 49 (see
below), which both seek to modify the current housing tax credit enacted by
SB 2X 15 (Ashburn), enacted as part of the Budget Compromise earlier this
year. The credit is equal to an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the
purchase price or $10,000 in the case of the purchase of a qualified
principal residence on and after March 1, 2009, and before March 1, 2010,
but not to exceed an aggregate limitation of $100,000,000 for all credits
allowable. This bill would extend the credit to purchases made on or after
March 1, 2009 and before December 1, 2010, and would increase the aggregate
credit limitation to $300,000,000.
Position: Support
Status: Assembly Revenue & Taxation Committee
AB 902 (Torres) Housing Tax Credit for Purchase of Foreclosed
Homes - This bill would, for taxable years beginning on or after
January 1, 2009 and before January 1, 2012, allow a housing tax credit in
an amount, not to exceed $3,000, that is otherwise equal to 2% of the
amount paid or incurred for the purchase as a primary residence of a
foreclosed dwelling by a taxpayer whose gross income does not exceed 120%
of the region's median income. It would fund this tax credit by suspending
the mortgage interest deduction on second homes for tax years 2010 and
2011. C.A.R. will oppose this legislation until an alternative funding
mechanism is amended into the bill.
Position: Oppose Unless
Amended Status: Assembly
Revenue & Taxation Committee
SB 49 (Dutton) New Home Tax Credit - The C.A.R. Officers,
in light of the inclusion in the state budget (February) of the new home
tax credit, adopted a support position on SB 49 (Dutton). In January C.A.R.
adopted an “oppose unless amended” position on SB 49 because it only
extended the tax credit to new homes. SB 49 was changed after the January
meetings. It now removes the cap on the amount of state funds committed to
the $10,000 tax credit for new homes enacted by SB 2X 15 after the C.A.R.
January meetings as part of the state budget.
Position: Support
Status: Senate Revenue & Taxation Committee Suspense
File
C. Other Housing Bills of Bills of Interest
AB 498 (Hayashi) Multifamily Housing for Veterans - This
bill would require the California Department of Veterans Affairs (CDVA) to
collaborate with the Department of Housing and Community Development to
facilitate the development of multi-family housing for military veterans
and their families. It requires CDVA to take action to ensure that if land
is donated to the state for the express purpose of providing land for
military veterans' housing, or if the department receives funding for a
housing project restricted for the use of military veterans, any such
housing built on that land, or
using that source of funds, shall, only may be used only for housing for
military veterans.
Position: Favor
Status: Assembly Veterans Affairs Committee
AB 720 (Caballero) Housing Element Units Rehabilitation -
Makes changes in housing element law related to the use of certain existing
units in meeting a local government's share of the regional housing need.
AB 720 proposes to delete the requirement that a local government must
provide committed assistance within the first two years of the housing
element planning period in order to count certain substantially
rehabilitated units and other types of affordable housing units towards
meeting its share of the regional housing need. It also provides that a
city, county, or city and county may include weatherization and energy
efficiency improvements, including measures improving the efficiencies of
heating, cooling and electrical systems, as part of its efforts to
substantially rehabilitate a unit.
Position: Watch
Status: Assembly Floor
AB 897 (Torres) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Program - This bill would establish the Homeless Prevention and
Rapid Re-Housing Program within the department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD) for the purpose of distributing funds to 2 qualified
populations of individuals and families facing housing instability,
estimated at approximately $44 million, provided by the federal Homeless
Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program established under the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. This bill would also establish the
Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Account within the Federal Trust
Fund, a continuously appropriate fund, for the purpose of accepting and
distributing these federal funds
Position: Favor
Status: Assembly Housing & Community Development
Committee
AB 1246 (Jones) Housing Cooperative Trust and Workforce Housing
Trust - This bill, sponsored by Associated Cooperatives, Inc.,
expands existing law, developed over 30 years, that authorizes
limited-equity cooperative housing, by creating new opportunities for low-
and moderate-income workforce housing. It is intended to provide incentives
for sponsors to invest in affordable work force housing projects. AB
1246
authorizes creation of a new type of housing cooperative: the "workforce
housing cooperative trust." It additionally provides that, in the event
that a housing cooperative must dissolve, if it has received public
subsidies, the dissolution must take place in a public and transparent
manner, including a hearing and notice to other cooperatives in the
state.
Position: Favor
Status: Assembly Floor
AB 1422 (Bass) Redevelopment Agency Refinancing of Subprime
Mortgages - California Redevelopment Association (CRA), the
sponsor of this bill, "believes legislative proposals for the use of
redevelopment funds during this critical time should emphasize flexibility
and enable local response. The provisions in this bill are a
re-introduction of 2008's AB 2594 (Mullin) and would enhance the ability of
local government to serve people in their communities during this
foreclosure crisis by permitting redevelopment agencies to use tax
increment funds, that are not held in the 20 percent Low &Moderate fund
set aside, to acquire, assume or refinance mortgages or make loans to
income-eligible homeowners faced with foreclosure. Local redevelopment
agencies would also be authorized to assist lenders or for-profit or
non-profit developers in purchasing, assuming or refinancing subprime or
nontraditional mortgages. This bill also allows agencies to purchase vacant
and foreclosed homes and sell them to any purchaser regardless of income
and, if necessary, manage, maintain and rent the home prior to sale.
Position: Support
Status: Assembly Floor
AB 1432 (Mendoza) Expenditure Control of TARP Funds - The
California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA)'s primary purpose is meeting the
housing needs of persons and families of low or moderate income. Existing
law authorizes the agency to make loans to qualified mortgage lenders under
terms and conditions requiring the proceeds to be used for making
construction loans and mortgage loans for the purpose of financing housing
developments and residential structures. This bill provides that if CalHFA
receives funds from the federal Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP),
established pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008,
the agency would be limited to using the funds to make or refinance
acquisition, construction, or development loans for housing developments or
residential structures for persons meeting an income test.
Position: Favor
Status: Assembly Housing & Community Development
Committee
SB 326 (Strickland) Required Quantification of Local Foreclosure
Rate in Housing Element - This bill requires cities and counties
to include within the housing needs assessment portion of their housing
elements a quantification of their existing and projected foreclosure rates
and an analysis of the impact of foreclosures on housing needs. The purpose
of this measure is to help local government agencies address the fact that
foreclosure rates are at historic highs, and with the recession and banks
tightening their lending guidelines, many foreclosed homes cannot be sold.
These homes are generally left vacant and can become a blight on the
community. They can also become a magnet for crime. By requiring cities and
counties to analyze the impact of foreclosures, this bill seeks to
facilitate local efforts to address the impacts.
Position: Favor
Status: Senate Appropriations Committee
III. Federal Issues
A. Discussion Items
1. Federal First Time Homebuyer Tax Credit
The First-time Homebuyer Tax Credit (HTC) was changed as part of the 2009
Stimulus Package. Below is a description of the previous HTC and the
updated HTC.
If the home was purchased between April 8, 2008 and December 31,
2008:
- The tax credit is 10% of the purchase price, capped at
$7,500.
- The tax credit does need to be repaid, therefore working more as an
interest free loan. The credit is repaid out of your taxes over
15-years.
- You cannot get the credit if the property is financed by a tax
exempt qualified mortgage issue/bond.
If the home was purchased between January 1, 2009 and November 30,
2009:
- The tax credit is 10% of the purchase price, capped at
$8,000.
- The tax credit does not need to be repaid – the only exception
being if the property is sold within 3-years of purchase.
- You can get the credit if the property is financed by a tax exempt
qualified mortgage issue/bond.
REALTORS® are working to extend the first-time homebuyer tax credit for
another year.
2. GSE Update
While there are many ideas being floated about what Congress should do in
regards to the future of the GSE (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac now that they
are in conservatorship, Congress itself does not appear ready to begin
moving any legislation. Without proposed legislation introduced, it
is still too early to know how Fannie and Freddie will be brought out of
their current state of conservatorship. Making the issue more
difficult is the increased reliability by the housing market for the GSE to
maintain an affordable and stable supply of capital due to the lack of
private investors.
3. Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) was created over 30 years ago to
encourage FDIC insured banks to lend in low and moderate income
areas. Recently, it has come under attack as being a significant
contributor to the current housing and financial crisis. The CRA has
and is being blamed for forcing lenders to take on risky loans to qualify
homebuyers under the CRA program.
Supporters of the CRA point out that during the height of subprime mortgage
lending, only about one in four of these mortgages were made by CRA-covered
banks, and the rest were made by private independent mortgage companies and
lenders not covered by the CRA rules.
Whether the CRA did or did not actually play a role in the housing crisis,
it would appear that many in Congress are looking to raise CRA as an issue
for debate.
4. Assumable Loans
At the NAR Midyear Meetings in D.C., the NAR Board of Directors voted on
and approved the following policy:
“That NAR support eliminating the “due on sale” clause for FHA and VA loans
for all loans – new and retroactive.”
In 1996, C.A.R. took the following position:
“That C.A.R., in conjunction with N.A.R., seek the reinstitution of freely
assumable FHA-insured loans to owner-occupant purchasers.”
It is unclear if there is enough support either in Congress, or by the FHA
and VA to remove the “due on sale” clause. As this is a new idea,
there aren’t currently any proposals out there for legislation.
5. FHFA Considers Relaxing GSE Affordable Housing Goals
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has issued a proposed rule that
would lower Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac affordable housing goals.
Fannie and Freddie both have goals that state how much of their home loan
activity for a year should be focused on low- and moderate-income housing,
special affordable housing, underserved areas, low and moderate-income home
purchases, special affordable home purchase, underserved areas home
purchase. In addition, they are recommending that the modifications
made under the Administrations loan modification program count towards the
goals; however, FHFA is proposing that jumbo-conforming loan not be counted
toward the goals.
The affordable housing goals have historically hurt high-price areas,
including those in California, because of how the goals are
calculated. Low and moderate-income is defined as a household whose
income is at or below an area’s median. High-cost areas often require
more income for home purchases; therefore fewer loans in high-cost areas
help Fannie and Freddie to meet their goals.
NAR has submitted a supporting comment letter to HUD on the proposed rule.
IV. Other Business
V. Adjournment